Douglas and Eira Conacher were a devoted married couple with a publishing business in central London. They were conventional in every way but one. They were determined that whoever died first would try to contact the other from the afterlife. Douglas, 20 years older than Eira , died first on June 6th, 1958, a few months later. Douglas contacted IRA through the medium Leslie Flint. They carried on regular conversations over the next several years and authored two books together with both their names on the cover. It’s quite obvious from the intimate conversations that Eira Coniker Living on the Earth Plane, was having normal conversations with her husband, Douglas, on the afterlife plane. A brief audio clip from one of their conversations follows. Ira is sitting in the room with Leslie Flint. Her husband, Douglas, in Spirit, speaks to her. The clip demonstrates that Douglas is alive and knows what is going on in Ira’s life. He responds to her question about whether he caused a light in her home the previous evening by saying he did.
You can listen to their recorded conversation. A transcript of the recording follows the controls below.
Support this effort to give people the truth about the reality of the afterlife by contributing $6 for a membership.
Transcript:
Douglas and IRA Conacher were a devoted married couple with a publishing business in central London. They were conventional in every way but one. They were determined that whoever died first would try to contact the other from the afterlife. Douglas, 20 years older than Eira, died first on June 6th, 1958. A few months later, Douglas contacted Eira through the medium Leslie Flint. They carried on regular conversations over the next several years and authored two books with their names on the covers. It’s quite obvious from the intimate conversations that Eira Conacher Living on the Earth Plane, was having normal conversations with her husband, Douglas, on the afterlife plane. A brief audio clip from one of their conversations follows. Eira is sitting in the room with Leslie Flint. Her husband, Douglas, in Spirit, speaks to her. The clip demonstrates that Douglas is alive and knows what is going on in Ira’s life. He responds to her question about whether he caused a light in her home the previous evening by saying he did.
Eira: Was that your light I saw last night?
Douglas: Yes. You know, I’m wondering if you do see as much as I hope you do. I try to attract your attention in various ways and I felt sure . . . In fact, the other evening, I felt sure you realized I was there. You do sense my presence even though you don’t see me.
Eira: Yes.
Douglas: You know, sometimes during your sleep you come here . . . and we’re together.
Eira: Yes.
Douglas: We’re together a great deal, you know.
Eira: Really? I wish I could remember. I have occasionally remembered.
Douglas: Yes. Have you decided to stay as you are or what? Are you thinking of making a change?
Eira: Well, you tell me to remain where I am at the moment.
Douglas: Well yes, that’s what I think. I think you would be well advised to stay put and not make any change for the moment. I don’t think there would be much point and it would not be a good idea to do anything drastic.
Eira: Well, I have so many interests.
Douglas: I don’t know . . .
Eira: Yes. Darling, I haven’t asked after your favorite cat lately.
Douglas: Oh, he’s very well.
Eira: How’s he getting on?
Douglas: He’s fine. You know I do love my animals.
Eira: I know. You did love that cat very much.
Douglas: Not as much as I love you!
Eira: No. Well, I’m awfully glad you still love me.
Douglas: Of course I do! I always shall. I’m just waiting for the day for you to join me.
Eira: Yes.
Douglas: The years come and go. Time will pass and we shall be together.
Eira: That will be lovely.
Conclusion
The story of Douglas and Eira Conacher is a touching tale of devotion that transcends the boundaries between life and death. Their unique commitment to remain connected, even after Douglas’s passing, led to an extraordinary series of events where they continued to communicate through a medium. Their conversations, which covered daily life and emotional support, were profound enough to result in the publication of two books, symbolizing their enduring connection. This narrative not only offers a glimpse into their personal lives but also explores themes of love, the afterlife, and the possibility of ongoing relationships beyond the physical realm. The recordings and transcripts of their communications serve as a testament to their unbroken bond and the comfort they found in each other’s continued presence, providing a powerful narrative of eternal love and the human spirit’s resilience.
FAQ’s
What is considered proof of the afterlife?
Proof of the afterlife typically refers to any evidence or experiences that suggest life continues in some form after physical death. This can include near-death experiences, communication through mediums, remembered past lives, and other phenomena that are hard to explain by physical science alone.
How credible is the evidence of life after death?
The credibility of evidence for life after death varies widely among experts, scholars, and the general public. While some find personal experiences and anecdotal reports convincing, others argue that more scientific validation is needed. Research in areas like near-death experiences and mediumship continues to evolve, providing various degrees of support for these phenomena.
Can near-death experiences be considered evidence of life after death?Near-death experiences (NDEs) are often cited as potential evidence of life after death. Many people who have had NDEs report similar experiences of a transcendent nature, such as encountering deceased loved ones, experiencing a sense of peace, or observing events from outside their body. Researchers are exploring whether these experiences are physiological, psychological, or indeed evidence of an afterlife.
What role do mediums play in providing proof of the afterlife?
Mediums claim to communicate with the spirits of the deceased, often providing messages and information that they assert could only be known by the dead person. Skeptics argue that these could be the result of cold reading techniques or fraud, while believers see mediumship as solid evidence supporting the existence of an afterlife.
Is there scientific research that supports evidence of life after death?
Some scientific studies have investigated phenomena associated with life after death, including mediumship, near-death experiences, and reincarnation memories, especially in children. The results remain controversial and inconclusive, with ongoing debates about the methodologies used and the interpretations of findings.
How do personal testimonies contribute to the evidence of life after death?
Personal testimonies are often powerful and deeply meaningful to those who share them. They can provide anecdotal evidence that supports the belief in an afterlife. However, from a scientific standpoint, personal testimonies are subjective and cannot be universally applied as proof without replicable and controlled studies.
What are the main criticisms against the belief in life after death?
Critics argue that evidence of life after death is largely anecdotal, lacks empirical support, and often relies on emotional reasoning rather than scientific evidence. Many also point out that experiences attributed to the afterlife can be explained by brain chemistry, psychological states, or fraud.
