Learn About Your Life . . . and Your Afterlife
The Afterlife Research and Education Institute has created apps with
- The most compelling evidence that you will live on after your body dies
- Proof that the end of this life is a painless, easy transition to the next life
- What everyday life in the afterlife is like
- How you can communicate with your loved ones in the afterlife
- What your personality style is and why you have conflict with people in your life
You can go through the apps at https://afterlifeinstitute.org.
The following sample is from the app with the proof you will never die. To see the whole app with 10 lessons full of evidence that you and your loved ones will live together in the afterlife, go to this link: https://youwillneverdie.afterlifeinstitute.org/
People Talk with Loved Ones through Materialization Mediums
A message from Dr. Hogan
Materialization is the most extraordinary claim in this entire body of evidence, and for that reason it has drawn the most scrutiny — and, in the best-documented cases, survived it. Investigators used infrared photography, sealed rooms, and physical restraints on the medium, and still recorded encounters in which observers reported that a deceased person appeared to take on a temporary, visible, and in some cases touchable form.
As you read these accounts, notice not just that someone was seen, but who recognized them, and how precisely. That specificity, and the extraordinary conditions under which these sittings were observed, is the heart of the case this lesson makes.
A Man Whose Body Is Dead Speaks to His Love
David Thompson is one of the world's foremost materialization mediums. A materialization medium sits in a darkened room surrounded by a group of people called "sitters." People from the afterlife materialize and speak to, touch, and even kiss loved ones sitting in the room. David's gift has been independently tested over the years in controlled environments, providing no room for doubt.
In one of the most carefully witnessed materialization cases on record, a woman attended a sitting expecting nothing more than a quiet evening among friends. What she experienced instead was the unmistakable presence of her late partner — his voice, his manner of standing, and details of their private life together that left her and the other sitters with no ordinary explanation. Investigators present that evening later testified to the conditions under which the sitting took place, ruling out the most common accusations of fraud.
The materialization account
Nick:Can you hear me?
All:Yes we can hear you. You're OK. You're fine.
Nick:Oh My God. I'm a bit frightened of this.
All:It's OK, You're OK…you're among friends. You're OK, just remain calm. Relax. It's OK.
Circle member:It's just a bit strange.
Nick:You're right it is a bit strange.
All:It's OK.
Circle member:Take a moment to adjust.
Nick:I never thought I'd do this.
Circle member:It's wonderful that you have come.
Circle member:Can you tell us who you are?
Nick:My name's Nick.
All:It's Nick, Hello Nick.
Sarah:Baby.
Nick:I can't. It's Sarah, I want to see Sarah.
All:You're here to see Sarah.
Sarah:Darling I'm here. I love you baby I love you so much.
Nick:I love you too.
Sarah:Don't ever leave me OK. I know you're with me.
Nick:I spend as much time with you as I can. I'm always with you to help.
Sarah:OK my baby, just stay close. I love you so much and you know how grateful I am to you for doing this.
Nick:You know something… all those things that you bought?
Sarah:Yeah.
Nick:They're gone, they're lost. They was lost.
Sarah:Yeah?
Nick:Don't worry about them.
Sarah:Really?
Nick:I knew you was there. I knew you was there.
Sarah:Did you darling.
Sarah:I just, was I enough for you? I just…
Nick:Listen to me, listen to me we haven't got long. Listen to me.
Sarah:OK my baby.
Nick:Always remember…
Sarah:Yeah?
Nick:I love you with all my heart.
Sarah:OK.
Nick:I told you that just before I left you.
Sarah:I know.
Nick:I'll always be with you. I'll always be with you.
Sarah:OK my darling.
Nick:Promise me something. I want you to be happy.
Sarah:I will for you. I will for you. I'll make the best of what I've got here. For you.
Nick:Remember whatever happens we'll always be together till we meet again.
Sarah:You promise me that?
Nick:I promise you.
Sarah:You…
Nick:From the bottom of my heart, I promise you.
Sarah:OK my darling.
Nick:I want you to be… happy!
Sarah:I will try. I am trying I'm trying so hard. It's just such a shock you know. But I'm trying hard. I'm doing better Darling.
Nick:You are girl, and you're doing fantastic.
Sarah:As long as I've got you with me and I know I do. I just hope I did enough for you.
Nick:Yes you did, you were everything I ever wanted.
Sarah:I was… good. I just wanted to be enough.
Nick:That's why I died peacefully.
Sarah:You…Oh thank goodness.
Nick:That's why I had that look of peace on my face.
Sarah:Yes. Yes. Did you see me when I went to see you?
Nick:I did. And everything you put into the coffin. I saw it all.
Sarah:Oh, thank you darling. I tried to do right by you. I tried to do everything I could. I really tried hard.
Nick:You done more than any man could ever want. More than any man could ever want.
Sarah:OK my baby because you know you were worth it. Don't ever doubt how much I loved you and how much I will continue to love you. Don't ever doubt it.
Nick:Don't ever doubt my love for you.
Sarah:OK my baby.
(Nick places his hands around Sarah's face in an embrace)
Sarah:Oh!! Oh I love you. I love you.
(Sharp whoosh — sounds of dematerialization)
Everyone in the room is caught up in the intense emotion of the reunion. We all feel privileged to have witnessed a very special event, a meeting between two worlds.
Montague Keen Materializes and Speaks to People Who Knew Him in This Life
In a séance on September 2, 2004, with medium David Thompson, Monty, as he was known to his colleagues, materialized for a group of sitters who all knew and worked with him until his passing over eight months. They knew who had come into the room.
Montague Keen was a respected journalist and psychical researcher during his lifetime — a man whose profession trained him to be skeptical of exactly this kind of claim. After his death, sitters at séances conducted by mediums he had personally investigated while alive reported that Keen materialized and identified himself, offering information about his own research and personal life that those present had no way of knowing. That a trained investigator became, after his death, a subject of the very phenomenon he spent his life scrutinizing gives the case an unusual double weight.
The Montague Keen sessions
Monty:Hello.
Sitters:Hello.
Monty:Can you hear me?
Sitters:Yes, we can!
Monty:Am I speaking clearly?
Sitters:Yes, you are!
Monty:Oh, good. You know who it is, don't you?
Robin Foy:Monty.
Monty:Of course, it's Monty.
(laughter)
Monty addressed the researchers in the room who knew him well.
Monty:Are you here, Guy? (Guy Lyon Playfair — fellow researcher).
Guy:Yes, I'm over here.
Monty:Oh, good, good. I'm so glad that… that you're able to be here with the rest of them.
John Samson:Well. Me, too.
Monty:Yes, and… is that you, Sandra?
Sandra Foy:Yes, it is!
Monty:Oh, they [managed to get you here]
Sandra:Yes, they did. Yes.
Monty:[indistinct comment – fantastic?]
Sandra:It's wonderful to hear you, Monty.
Monty:Does my voice sound clear?
Sandra:It does. Very good. You've mastered it very well.
Sitters:Yes. Very good.
Monty:Well. It… it's taken me a little bit of time.
Robin Foy:That's right, Monty. Yes.
Monty:There can be very little time… to, to, to… get it just right.
Sitters:Yes. Yes.
Monty shared with Guy Playfair information known only to the researchers, including the secret address of a haunting at a place called Enfield they had investigated together. Monty shares that since his entry into the spirit world, he has learned what was creating the haunting and shares it with Guy.
Monty:Now. It have a few things… that I… that I want to say
Sitters:Yes. OK.
Monty:to you all. First of all, to Guy.
Guy:Hmm.
Monty:It's not like Enfield, is it.
Guy:Not yet, no… but I'm sure you'll do your best.
Monty:You know what I'm talking about, don't you?
Guy:Indeed. Yes.
Monty:It's nothing like Enfield.
John:Well… I'm glad to hear that. [chuckle]
Monty:Do you know… I… I've investigated, since I've been over here, regarding Enfield, Greenstreet. I've investigated.
Monty:Can you hear me?
Guy:Yeah.
Monty:And I have to say that you was right in your assumptions that it was the young girl, Janet.
Guy:Hmm.
Monty:It was her pituitary gland, coming into sexual awareness, puberty, that was creating the phenomena.
Guy:Yes, it did coincide with her, her blood.
Monty:Well. I can tell you that that's what it was.
John:Hmm.
Monty:And, and, and, Guy. I understand that you're going to talk at my… at my urm Day of Memory.
Guy:Yes. Indeed.
Monty:It seems so silly to say a Day of Memory…
(general laughter)
Monty:when I still here, doesn't it!
Helen Duncan's Trial Witnesses Confirm the Materializations of People They Know Intimately
Helen Duncan remains one of the most famous — and most legally significant — mediums in this field's history; she was prosecuted in 1944 under Britain's centuries-old Witchcraft Act, largely because wartime authorities feared what her sittings might reveal. What is less well known is the sheer volume of witness testimony from her sittings: ordinary people, under oath, describing materializations of specific relatives they recognized by face, voice, and intimate personal detail. Whatever one makes of the legal case against her, the witness testimony itself remains a remarkable body of firsthand accounts.
Helen Duncan was an especially talented materialization medium who had people from the afterlife materialize, speak to their loved ones, touch them, and even kiss them while others in the room watched. The room she sat in had a cabinet with a curtain over the entrance. The room was lit with red light because red light is not as harsh as white light, so people from the afterlife could materialize and appear clearly to their loved ones sitting in the room.
Jane Rust was one of the witnesses in Helen Duncan's defense. She sat in the Old Bailey courtroom describing how she sat with the medium among a group of other people. She testified under oath that during the session, her deceased husband, mother, and aunt materialized, stood before her, spoke to her clearly, and touched and kissed her.
The Helen Duncan case
Defense Attorney:Had you any doubt about it being your husband?
Jane Rust:No doubt whatsoever.
Defense Attorney:How close up to him were you?
Jane Rust:As close as I am to this.
Defense Attorney:Did he speak to you?
Jane Rust:He spoke to me.
Defense Attorney:Did you recognize his voice?
Jane Rust:I did. I was perfectly certain.
Defense Attorney:Did he say anything to you in particular that struck you as of importance?
Jane Rust:Just spoke about the family. He said that he was always with me, and he would be on the other side waiting for me; he would never leave me until I joined him.
Defense Attorney:Had he altered in appearance at all?
Jane Rust:No, sir, he had not altered — just a wee bit thinner, perhaps, than he was in health, but my husband was very ill for three years before he went. He said, 'Put your hand in mine, dear,' so I gave him my right hand. He took hold of it with his right and clasped my hand very tightly.
Judge:It was flesh and blood, was it?
Jane Rust:It was very cold, my Lord, but it was his hand. I held it firmly. I felt the knuckles. He suffered with rheumatism, my Lord, and I felt the nobbly knuckles.
Defense Attorney:Did he kiss you?
Jane Rust:He did, sir, right on the mouth….
Jane Rust:[My mother] came out and stood on the side of the cabinet. I wanted to be close to her, because I had never been so close before; I wanted to get right in contact. I said, 'Mother, you are not going back without kissing me, are you, this time?' She said, 'Come here, my child'; she beckoned me to her side. She made me stand, and I was standing facing her. She turned me to the sitters and patted my shoulder and said, 'My loving daughter' — introduced me, sort of thing.
Defense Attorney:Did you touch her?
Jane Rust:I did. I kissed her.
Defense Attorney:Did she put her arms on you, or did you put your arms on her?
Jane Rust:She put her arm around my shoulders.
Defense Attorney:Tell me a little about her voice. What was her voice like?
Jane Rust:It was her natural voice…. My mother had a mole in the hollow of her chin and another over the left eyebrow, and without that it would not be my mother, and she had it there, and I was satisfied…. I got as close to [my aunt] as I got to my mother and my husband…. She said to me [words in Spanish here]. I said [words in Spanish]…. It was Gibraltarian Spanish. It was not the Spanish, possibly, that they speak in Spain itself, but the Gibraltarian Spanish.
Defense Attorney:Did you recognize the figure that spoke to you?
Jane Rust:Yes, absolutely, sir. She was my aunt, my mother's sister, and I recognized her because she is a replica of my own mother; they were always taken for twins, but they were not twins.
Why Is This Evidence Beyond a Reasonable Doubt of the Afterlife?
The proof in materialization cases rests on two pillars: the conditions of observation, and the specificity of recognition. These sittings were conducted under some of the most rigorous scrutiny in the history of psychical research — infrared photography, physical restraint of the medium, searched rooms, and in Helen Duncan's case, sworn courtroom testimony given under oath and cross-examination. Under those conditions, sitters did not report a vague shape or an ambiguous presence. They reported specific, recognizable individuals: a husband's exact voice and manner, a colleague's personal research knowledge, a mother's particular mole and turn of phrase, a hand with the exact texture of rheumatoid knuckles. A fraudulent medium, working under these constraints, would have had to somehow gather and perform deeply personal, verifiable details about a stranger's deceased loved one — repeatedly, under monitored conditions, without ever being caught. The more direct explanation is the one the witnesses themselves gave, under oath: the person who appeared was who they said they were.
Reflection: Materialization is the hardest of these phenomena to accept, and the hardest to fully explain away. What would it mean for your own grief if, even once, you could see as well as hear?
Not every era has needed séance rooms and darkened parlors. In the twentieth century, some began to hear their loved ones through something far more ordinary: the static of a radio, or the hiss of a blank tape.
Questions and Topics for Group Discussion
- Materialization — someone actually appearing, visible and sometimes touchable — is described as the hardest phenomenon in this course to accept. Where do you personally land on that belief?
- The Nick and Sarah case captures raw, unfiltered emotion. What did that exchange reveal to you about what an afterlife reunion might actually feel like?
- Montague Keen was a professional skeptic during his life. Does it change your view of his case that he was, in life, someone dedicated to investigating and often disproving these claims?
- Jane Rust described the physical sensation of her mother's and husband's hands. What role does physical, sensory detail play in how convincing you find an account?
- Helen Duncan was legally prosecuted for her mediumship. What does it say about the culture of her time that this kind of phenomenon was treated as a crime?
Explore Our Other Resources
Afterlife Communication Training — A free guided audio course teaching you to open your own connection with a loved one in the afterlife, with an 86% success rate. Begin the free introduction →
Personality Styles Test and Interpretation — A free 20-question assessment revealing your personality type and why you connect naturally with some people and clash with others. Take the free test →
